Z&I 1
- Follow The zombie apocalypse survival homestead on WordPress.com
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
Blogs I Follow
- Foundation for Freedom Online
- Lame Cherry
- Big Country Expat
- thetacticalhermit.com/
- Anonymous Conservative
- ஜ ۩ Whiskey Tango Texas ۩ ஜ
- The Neo-Ciceronian Times
- Uncle John's Band
- The Patrol Base
- Thuletide
- Eatgrueldog
- Black Wattle Nemeton
- Who is Robert Malone
- Manhattan Contrarian
- AFFIRMATIVE RIGHT
- RT - Daily news
- Not even trying: the corruption of real science
- Bear Bussjaeger
- New Discourses
- Activist Post
The grid, in practice.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I respect your frustration and pain, but you are expressing it without respect for the people you are trying to influence (the left). If you want to win them you have to listen to them and love them first (not necessarily agree with them). If you don’t want to win them, what is the purpose of your posts? – Jim
LikeLike
Excellent question.
In truth, half my extended family has gone off the deep end with them. People that have known me for 57 years suddenly believe I am ‘deplorable’ on the word of obviously corrupt and evil politicians. Of course, I still love them.
Try this on. http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/42-100/the-parable-of-brats-style-versus-substance.
If they are not amenable to reason, logic and truth are beyond them. They are operating on instinct and emotion. Other methods must be tried.
I find I have a lot to say on this question. Please allow me to get back to you in a future post. I have to go weld my plow back together before it snows again.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You cannot reason someone out of a position they did not reason into, and there is a great deal of distance between being loving and being nice.
They are not prizes to be won; they are humans, rational beings who have free will of their own. The conceit that anything we do can actually control their actions is mildly dehumanzing.
There’s also the issue that your post assumes that we have not listened, and do not love them, and in addition have not been reasoning with them— while ignoring the question of if “the grid” is an accurate representation of what at the very least a vocal group of the left have been saying.
I have had friends cut themselves off from me, because they are “moderates” while I am a “radical extremist.” You see, they view Obama as a moderate Republican, rather than a flaming right-winger as their “more liberal” friends do.
I have been insulted, attacked, and just this week a large, well funded movement went into action to deny that I can even speak as a woman because I do not agree with their political and philosophical claims, on the basis of science. You see, I believe killing a human is a bad thing, and killing an innocent one is a horrific thing…and I refuse to pretend that an unborn human is not a member of the species. Thus, I am not a member of my sex, no matter how many children I have.
Facts. Do. Not. Matter. To. Them.
So, because one listens to them, and respects them as human beings, and loves them enough to try to stop them from a horrific wrong– you have to try other routes.
Including graphics that are shockingly direct as to what the meaning of their words actually involves.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wow Great post in it’s own right.
I took James’ meaning as ‘win them back to God and sanity’.
Honestly, at this point, I’m mostly happy to be able to shut them up for a spell, but it’s hard not to be angry at the calumny..
LikeLike
A bit more temper than I really like displaying, but I’m getting to where I’m pretty sure that part of the problem is being too polite to people who mistake manners for submission– and to others, who only like manners when it works for them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Exactly so. They’ve been allowed to run roughshod. I’m sick of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I did mean win them back to God and sanity. I don’t think your tactics are going to win anyone. (And my likes indicate I read, not agreed). You can’t hate someone out of hate. You can only love them out of hate. If they hate you and you hate them back, you are more alike than you are different.
LikeLike
That is not true– it was famously countered by the “they both push little old ladies” argument. Hating evil is not in any way equivalent to hating good, which disproves the claim for any relevant use. (It could, after all, be argued that love and hate are more alike than different–they are powerful and passionate, after all. But the differences are enough to make it laughable.)
Incidentally, you might want to look into following your own advice– you keep accusing folks of an emotion or motivation and urging them to a different one, without ever listening to find out if that is their motive or not.
It is not pleasant to deny a drunk the money for more wine; it is not loving to help him kill himself, and possibly others, by providing it.
LikeLiked by 1 person